Matt's comment on 'What is legal is not always moral' missed the point of my blog. I am not comparing slaves to cigarette smokers. I am comparing the actions of our government, meaning we the people of America, with regard to slavery and legal cigarettes.
Slavery was legal in America for a time. In other words, it was the will of the American people that the practice of people owning people should be allowed. Eventually the people of America realized slavery was immoral and laid down their lives to outlaw the practice.
Today, we the people allow cigarette manufacturers to concoct a deadly product specifically contrived to addict people and sell it for a profit. When used as directed, cigarette smoking kills more Americans than AIDS, alcohol, car accidents, murders, suicides, drugs and fires combined*. Cigarettes are a defective product and a drain on society; $100 billion in health care costs are attributed to smoking every year.
If we took seriously the threat posed by cigarettes to our family, friends and society, we would treat cigarettes the way we treat any addictive drug and either make cigarettes illegal or require a doctor's prescription to get a pack. But we don't-
We don't hold cigarettes to the same standards as any other manufactured product; why? Is it because cigarettes have always been around? If so, we are paying heavy price to maintain the status quo.
That we the people allowed people to own people was immoral. That we the people allow cigarettes to be legal is similarly immoral.
We put an end to slavery. We will put an end to legal cigarettes. The question is when?
*http://www.idph.state.il.us/public/hb/hbsmoke.htm
View Photo Album
